4 results
Traumatic stress symptoms among Spanish healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective study
- Ana Portillo-Van Diest, Gemma Vilagut, Itxaso Alayo, Montse Ferrer, Franco Amigo, Benedikt L. Amann, Andrés Aragón-Peña, Enric Aragonès, Ángel Asúnsolo Del Barco, Mireia Campos, Isabel Del Cura-González, Meritxell Espuga, Ana González-Pinto, Josep M. Haro, Amparo Larrauri, Nieves López-Fresneña, Alma Martínez de Salázar, Juan D. Molina, Rafael M. Ortí-Lucas, Mara Parellada, José M. Pelayo-Terán, Aurora Pérez-Zapata, José I. Pijoan, Nieves Plana, Teresa Puig, Cristina Rius, Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez, Ferran Sanz, Consol Serra, Iratxe Urreta-Barallobre, Ronald C. Kessler, Ronny Bruffaerts, Eduard Vieta, Víctor Pérez-Solá, Jordi Alonso, Philippe Mortier, MINDCOVID Working Group
-
- Journal:
- Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences / Volume 32 / 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 09 August 2023, e50
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Aim
To investigate the occurrence of traumatic stress symptoms (TSS) among healthcare workers active during the COVID-19 pandemic and to obtain insight as to which pandemic-related stressful experiences are associated with onset and persistence of traumatic stress.
MethodsThis is a multicenter prospective cohort study. Spanish healthcare workers (N = 4,809) participated at an initial assessment (i.e., just after the first wave of the Spain COVID-19 pandemic) and at a 4-month follow-up assessment using web-based surveys. Logistic regression investigated associations of 19 pandemic-related stressful experiences across four domains (infection-related, work-related, health-related and financial) with TSS prevalence, incidence and persistence, including simulations of population attributable risk proportions (PARP).
ResultsThirty-day TSS prevalence at T1 was 22.1%. Four-month incidence and persistence were 11.6% and 54.2%, respectively. Auxiliary nurses had highest rates of TSS prevalence (35.1%) and incidence (16.1%). All 19 pandemic-related stressful experiences under study were associated with TSS prevalence or incidence, especially experiences from the domains of health-related (PARP range 88.4–95.6%) and work-related stressful experiences (PARP range 76.8–86.5%). Nine stressful experiences were also associated with TSS persistence, of which having patient(s) in care who died from COVID-19 had the strongest association. This association remained significant after adjusting for co-occurring depression and anxiety.
ConclusionsTSSs among Spanish healthcare workers active during the COVID-19 pandemic are common and associated with various pandemic-related stressful experiences. Future research should investigate if these stressful experiences represent truly traumatic experiences and carry risk for the development of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Mental impact of Covid-19 among Spanish healthcare workers. A large longitudinal survey
- J. Alonso, G. Vilagut, I. Alayo, M. Ferrer, F. Amigo, A. Aragón-Peña, E. Aragonès, M. Campos, I. del Cura-González, I. Urreta, M. Espuga, A. González Pinto, J. M. Haro, N. López Fresneña, A. Martínez de Salázar, J. D. Molina, R. M. Ortí Lucas, M. Parellada, J. M. Pelayo-Terán, A. Pérez Zapata, J. I. Pijoan, N. Plana, M. T. Puig, C. Rius, C. Rodriguez-Blazquez, F. Sanz, C. Serra, R. C. Kessler, R. Bruffaerts, E. Vieta, V. Pérez-Solá, P. Mortier, MINDCOVID Working group
-
- Journal:
- Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences / Volume 31 / 2022
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 29 April 2022, e28
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Aims
Longitudinal data on the mental health impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic in healthcare workers is limited. We estimated prevalence, incidence and persistence of probable mental disorders in a cohort of Spanish healthcare workers (Covid-19 waves 1 and 2) -and identified associated risk factors.
Methods8996 healthcare workers evaluated on 5 May–7 September 2020 (baseline) were invited to a second web-based survey (October–December 2020). Major depressive disorder (PHQ-8 ≥ 10), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD-7 ≥ 10), panic attacks, post-traumatic stress disorder (PCL-5 ≥ 7), and alcohol use disorder (CAGE-AID ≥ 2) were assessed. Distal (pre-pandemic) and proximal (pandemic) risk factors were included. We estimated the incidence of probable mental disorders (among those without disorders at baseline) and persistence (among those with disorders at baseline). Logistic regression of individual-level [odds ratios (OR)] and population-level (population attributable risk proportions) associations were estimated, adjusting by all distal risk factors, health care centre and time of baseline interview.
Results4809 healthcare workers participated at four months follow-up (cooperation rate = 65.7%; mean = 120 days s.d. = 22 days from baseline assessment). Follow-up prevalence of any disorder was 41.5%, (v. 45.4% at baseline, p < 0.001); incidence, 19.7% (s.e. = 1.6) and persistence, 67.7% (s.e. = 2.3). Proximal factors showing significant bivariate-adjusted associations with incidence included: work-related factors [prioritising Covid-19 patients (OR = 1.62)], stress factors [personal health-related stress (OR = 1.61)], interpersonal stress (OR = 1.53) and financial factors [significant income loss (OR = 1.37)]. Risk factors associated with persistence were largely similar.
ConclusionsOur study indicates that the prevalence of probable mental disorders among Spanish healthcare workers during the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic was similarly high to that after the first wave. This was in good part due to the persistence of mental disorders detected at the baseline, but with a relevant incidence of about 1 in 5 of HCWs without mental disorders during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. Health-related factors, work-related factors and interpersonal stress are important risks of persistence of mental disorders and of incidence of mental disorders. Adequately addressing these factors might have prevented a considerable amount of mental health impact of the pandemic among this vulnerable population. Addressing health-related stress, work-related factors and interpersonal stress might reduce the prevalence of these disorders substantially. Study registration number: NCT04556565
P02-287 - Primary Prevention in Depression. How to Inform Primary Care Attendees About Their Risk Level and Risk Profile of Major Depression?
- P. Moreno-Peral, J. Bellon, E. Motrico, B. Moreno-Küstner, B. Oliván-Blazquez, A. Fernández, C. Fernández, A. Rüntel, A. Rodriguez, M. Ballesta, J. Payo, M. Amezcua
-
- Journal:
- European Psychiatry / Volume 25 / Issue S1 / 2010
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 17 April 2020, 25-E913
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
The predictD study is a pioneering international study whose main objective was to develop a risk index for the onset of major depression in general practice attendees.
ObjectiveThe aim of this exploratory study was to determine the opinion of primary care attendees and their general practitioners about how to implement primary prevention of major depression. The intervention consisted of informing primary care attendees about their risk level and risk profile for the onset of major depression.
MethodsThe study participants were primary care attendees and general practitioners in urban health centres of 7 Spanish provinces. The methodology used was qualitative: there were 14 in-depth interviews (two from each province), 7 DAFO groups and 7 focus groups.
ResultsThe results showed that attendees generally welcomed this precautionary measure. Some even proposed potential changes in their lifestyles to prevent depression, such as improving social relationships, taking things more calmly or doing more leisure activities, while others asked their GP for advice. The GPs were more resistant about informing primary care attendees, raising doubts about the validity-reliability of the instrument, their lack of education about what they should or should not advise their attendees, the danger of creating excessive fear in their attendees, or the barrier of lack of time in the office to do these activities.
ConclusionsPrimary care attendees welcome this preventive measure more than their general practitioners.
Psychometric properties of the International Wellbeing Index in community-dwelling older adults
- C. Rodriguez-Blazquez, B. Frades-Payo, M. J. Forjaz, A. Ayala, P. Martinez-Martin, G. Fernandez-Mayoralas, F. Rojo-Perez
-
- Journal:
- International Psychogeriatrics / Volume 23 / Issue 1 / February 2011
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 19 July 2010, pp. 161-169
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Background: This is the first study to analyze the psychometric properties of the International Wellbeing Index (IWI), which comprises the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) and National Wellbeing Index (NWI), among community-dwelling older adults.
Methods: The IWI was applied to 1106 community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and over. The sample was additionally assessed using scales for comorbidity, disability, mood, general orientation to life, social support, health-related quality of life, and two questions assessing satisfaction with life as a whole and with life in Spain. The PWI and NWI were separately analyzed for acceptability, internal consistency, convergent and discriminative validity, and precision. Linear regression analyses of the PWI and the NWI were also conducted.
Results: Mean scores were 71.0 ± 13.5 for the PWI and 49.5 ± 14.4 for the NWI. No floor or ceiling effects were detected. Cronbach's α was 0.88 for the PWI and 0.92 for the NWI. Factor analysis identified two factors in the IWI, and one factor in the PWI and NWI respectively. The PWI showed a correlation of 0.50 with the “satisfaction with life as a whole” item, and the NWI showed a correlation of 0.73 with the “satisfaction with life in Spain” item. There were significant differences in scores: in the PWI, according to gender, age, social support, education and depression; and in the NWI, according to education and depression. The regression model identified psychosocial, health and functional factors as determinants of the PWI (explained variance: 46.8%).
Conclusions: The IWI displays good acceptability and is a consistent, valid and precise measure of global quality of life in older adults.